Connect with us

Badgers Basketball

The Starting 5: Wisconsin vs. Green Bay preview

Published

on

A 10-day layoff from games ends on Saturday afternoon as the Wisconsin Badgers take on in-state foe Green Bay at the Kohl Center. With a young team full of injuries, did the layoff allow the Badgers to regroup and refocus?

We’ll find out against a Phoenix team that got instantly better this past week with the insertion of former Marquette guard Sandy Cohen III. Plus, you know that Green Bay is going to give everything in this in-state contest.

UW and Green Bay will tip at 4:30pm CT and the game will be seen on the Big Ten Network.

So, what should we be watching for in this game? Let’s look at our Starting 5 for the Badgers vs. Phoenix.

1-2 Punch for Green Bay

Wisconsin has struggled a ton on the perimeter this season, and the debut of Sandy Cohen III for Green Bay gives the visitors a really good wing scorer to add to the mix. However, he was just 1-6 from deep and 6-16 from the field in his debut against Bowling Green earlier this week.

Could that have been knocking some of the game rust off? He’ll no doubt test the Badgers defense, but he’s not the only danger that GB possesses in this contest, as Cohen III is a great compliment player to leading scorer Khalil Small (16.2 points per game). Small is a dangerous player due to his versatility, as he’s shooting 45.2 percent from beyond the arc and 45.3 percent overall from the field on the year.

The Badgers have really struggled with players who can slash and dish to the perimeter and the Phoenix have two of those types in its uptempo offense. That should be something to watch in this contest.

Brad Davison’s Growth

The last time we saw Brad Davison, he was making one heady play and hitting a cool-as-ice free throw to win the game against Western Kentucky. We highlighted just how important that kind of on-court leadership and poise could be going forward.

Will that show against a Green Bay squad that loves to push the tempo and make teams play the entire length of the court on both sides of the ball? Davison hasn’t been short on effort or want-to, but he’ll be tested in a way he hasn’t been before this season.

He’s also potentially just the seventh freshman to average in double figures in his first season in a Badgers uniform. Davison is a good perimeter shooter, but also a confident one from mid-range and that can come in handy in this type of game. He can’t go cold against the style of defense Green Bay plays or it could be a long one.

Turnovers have been a bit of an issue for the freshman this season as well, as he’s committed 16 turnovers to just 23 assists. We’ll be watching how efficient Davison can make the Badgers and if he can help them control the tempo of this game.

Iverson and Turnovers, can he not commit them?

Speaking of turnovers, one of the keys to this game is going to be the play of Wisconsin small forward Kahlil Iverson. The junior has had a rough go of it in the turnover department and prior to injuries was beginning to see his minutes decrease because of it.

Iverson comes in to this game second on the team in turnovers with 27. Only Ethan Happ’s 34 are more on the Badgers. But, Iverson’s ability to hang on to the ball and make smart decisions on offense will be magnified under the pressure that Green Bay puts on opponents.

The Phoenix have forced an average of 15.4 turnovers per game and have turned opponents over more than they’ve turned the ball over despite the frenetic pace they like to play at. Iverson’s history of bad turnovers at inopportune times matters against those kind of results from your opponent.

He’s also going to be key because he’s the perfect player to bust loose against the pressure with his athletic ability.

Did the last 10 days settle Iverson’s mind down and let him focus on being a player to count on? We’ll get an answer early I have a feeling. If he’s not able to keep the ball under control it really stretches the Badgers thin having to go to walk-on’s or former walk-on’s like Aaron Moesch and T.J. Schlundt.

Third Scoring Option for Badgers

Davison and Happ have been a two-man scoring machine for the Badgers as of late, but that isn’t exactly a recipe for success as we’ve seen.

We’ve pretty much been asking for a consistent third scoring option for UW most of this season, and no one has emerged in that role. Junior guard Brevin Pritzl may be that answer though.

After being put on the bench in favor of Davison a few weeks ago, Pritzl has come back to the starting lineup due to injuries at guard. He’s stepped up nicely in the past two games, putting up 10 points in the loss to Marquette and 17 big points in the win over Western Kentucky.

If the Badgers can start to count on him to be a double-digit point scorer on a consistent basis it certainly changes the offensive equation for the Badgers.

Pounding the Boards

As much as UW’s ability to get a third scorer will matter, so to will its ability to exploit what should be a clear advantage on the boards. Green Bay has been downright awful on the boards against true D1 opponents this season. As in, 41.4 rebounds per game resulting in a 2-7 record against nine D1 teams.

That’s brutal, and even more so when you know the Badgers have a massive size advantage down low and have a 100-92 advantage in offensive rebounds this season too.

Green Bay will throw 6-8 forward David Jesperson up against Ethan Happ in what could be the biggest advantage in a player-on-player matchup for the Badgers. Let’s see if Happ and high-flying Khalil Iverson can get things done on the glass against a Phoenix team that doesn’t shoot the ball well. One-and-done possessions for Green Bay will likely equal a win for Wisconsin.

Prediction:

Wisconsin 82, Green Bay 70

As inconsistent as the Badgers have been, Green Bay has been its equal if not worse. They also don’t have the potential scorers that Wisconsin does. While the three-point shooting of Cohen III and Small are scary, so is their lack of an inside presence.

Look for Happ to have a big day all around and for that to make up for anything the Phoenix will or won’t do on the perimeter. As dangerous as GB could be, they have been wildly inconsistent and that’s what happens with six newcomers to the team and just 12 years of total experience on the team in general.

Wisconsin is young and inconsistent, but not near the level of the Phoenix. Wisconsin wins and keeps improving heading in to Big Ten play.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Badgers Basketball

Taylor Currie announces transfer from Badgers program

Published

on

And then there was one.

The 2018 Wisconsin Badgers basketball recruiting class had three players, but in the span of a month there is but one member of that group remaining.

On Tuesday, it was announced that 6-8 forward Taylor Currie will transfer from the program after redshirting last season.

He joins point guard Tai Strickland in the leaving the program.

That also means that 7-foot center Joe Hedstrom, who took a grayshirt offer and will go on scholarship next season, as the lone member of the 2018 class still with the program.

It also means that the Badgers will be down to just nine scholarship players as of now for the upcoming season, leaving plenty of space for a big haul in the offseason if they want to.

Wisconsin already came in to the offseason looking to even out the scholarship situation between the 2019 and 2020 class. Now, it may be able to really accomplish adding good pieces in 2019 and saving room for 2020.

The Badgers may fill two of the unused scholarships with Joey and Same Hauser, who are transferring from Marquette.

A decision will be coming from the Stevens Point natives in the next few weeks as they are scheduled to visit both Michigan State and Virginia.

Neither of those schools currently have the room for both brothers to join up, something the Badgers clearly don’t have to worry about.

As for Currie, according to the Wisconsin State Journal, he’ll head back to his native Michigan and play and Mott Community College in Flint, where he will still have two years to play there should he chose to use those years.

Wisconsin isn’t likely to limit its looks at the transfer market to just the Hauser’s either. There is a glaring and immediate need for experience up front, so the Badgers could fill that with a graduate transfer.

That was something the coaching staff was kicking around prior to any transfer out of the program anyway. Now, the Badgers have the flexibility to add that extra one-year player to the mix.

Stay tuned for the next few weeks, as things could move fast on the transfer front.

Continue Reading

Badgers Basketball

Are Badgers fans right to have a case of Bennet envy?

Published

on

No offseason, or for that matter, in-season, topic surrounding Wisconsin Badgers basketball was hotter in 2018-19 than what to make of the Gard era after nearly five years.

Some have become enraged at the lack of recruiting wins at the highest level and the seeming shortcoming of head coach Greg Gard’s in-game decision making.

Wisconsin basketball feels like it is regressing rather than progressing on so many levels. There’s the major inconsistencies on offense, a lack of free throw shooting and a seemingly overall lack of athleticism to get UW out of a jam if needed.

Let’s just say a vocal group of Badgers fans are very much in the anti-Gard mode. Most in that camp will point to the Virginia Cavaliers and their head coach Tony Bennett and say, why can’t the Badgers do that?

It’s easy to have program envy when the guy many wanted at Wisconsin a long time ago just cut down the nets for a national championship with another team.

More importantly, he did it with the very style of hard-nosed defense and a slower-paced offense that Wisconsin has been famous for for awhile now.

All of that got me to thinking…why not take a look at both programs and coaches head-to-head and see if facts back up the arguments for or against Gard?

After all, the offseason is all about taking stock. So, let’s take that deep dive.

What Does History Tell Us?

First off, the Badgers have made an appearance in four Final Fours as a program, which puts them in with 27 other programs to make at least that many in program history.

Wisconsin is tied with Arizona, Kansas State, LSU, UNLV and Utah at four. Leading the way with 20 is North Carolina, who won in 2017 and has made three final four appearances in the past decade.

But, beyond that since the 2000 Final Four, where the Badgers lost to eventual national champions Michigan State, there have been eight schools to go to back-to-back Final Fours.

Those schools would be Michigan State (2000, 2001 and 2009, 2010), Maryland (2001, 2002), Kansas (2002, 2003), Florida (2006, 2007), UCLA (2007, 2008), Butler (2010, 2011), Kentucky (2011, 2012), Louisville (2012, 2013) and your Wisconsin Badgers (2014, 2015).

Considering there have been 20 tournaments (including the 2000 edition), that means 80 possible teams and Wisconsin is one of just nine teams to have occupied a spot in back-to-back Final Fours.

Yes, that was four years ago, but just 11 percent of the teams were back-to-back Final Four participants overall. That’s some rarified air and a good reminder of just how difficult it was to do what the Badgers did.

Getting to that level and doing it over and over again is a very difficult ask, even for the most blue-blood of programs. So, let’s take that in to consideration.

In fact, just 37 total teams have made an appearance in a Final Four since 2000. Wisconsin is in the top 5 for most Final Four appearances with three — tied with Kentucky, Louisville, Syracuse, UCLA and Villanova.

Michigan State leads all schools with seven, UNC is next at six and they are followed by Kansas (5), and Duke and UConn (4).

Virginia on the other hand has made just one appearance in the Final Four since 2000. It was a national title winning appearance, but the point of longevity of a program is important here.

Gard vs. Bennett’s First 5 Years

Which brings us to today, with Greg Gard fully in charge and leading this program without many legacy recruits from the Bo Ryan era around.

Can Gard get the Badgers back to that promised land? It’s the million-dollar question around Madison and the Badger fandom nationwide.

UW fans had a taste of the blue-blood air and they want some more. That’s understandable and its where the comparison to Virginia and Tony Bennett comes in to play.

Could the answer simply be that Greg Gard is not Tony Bennett? That’s to say one coach is not like the other.

I think so.

Let’s remember the Wisconsin gig was Gard’s first ever head coaching gig anywhere. Bennett was born to be a coach, it literally is in his DNA.

His father got the Badgers to the 2000 Final Four, led one of the 90’s biggest upsets while coaching at Wisconsin-Green Bay and his family has had a historic amount of success while coaching at Wisconsin-Stevens Point as well.

The level of success running through the veins of the Bennett family is scary to be honest.

But, success just doesn’t come because you were born around quality coaching or playing. It comes from hard work, and to that end, Tony has certainly put in his fair share of work.

He wasn’t handed anything when he started coaching other than an opportunity to prove himself to his father.

Bennett won wherever he went, including on staff at Wisconsin and when he eventually took over for his dad at the basketball powerhouse known as Washington State. While there, Bennett went 69-33 and never had a losing season in his three years before leaving for Virginia.

But, people have quickly forgotten that Bennett was not an overnight success at Virginia.

Let’s take the first five years of Bennett’s career at UVA to that of Gard’s at Wisconsin for example. Bennett had a record of 106-60 (.638), while Gard has a record of 80-47 (.630) in just 4.5 years.

That winning percentage is nearly identical and so are a few other things. Both Gard and Bennett missed at least one NCAA tournament (Bennett’s Cavs actually missed 3). However, Gard has two Sweet 16 tournament runs compared to just one for Bennett after the first five seasons at the helm.

It all adds up to two coaches who look pretty similar on paper over the first parts of their tenures at Virginia and Wisconsin. Perhaps there’s another piece to the puzzle that is missing for Gard to be as successful as Bennet?

There comes comparison point No. 3…recruiting.

Recruiting

Perhaps nothing has driven the doubters of Gard more crazy than what has, or more appropriately, hasn’t happened on the recruiting trail in the first five years of Gard at the helm.

In one sense, you can probably throw the 2016 class out of the window, given Gard only had a half of a recruiting cycle to get things going his way.

But, beyond that class, the Badgers have really struggled to elevate their recruiting game and thus make them more than an occasional contender for a national championship.

The fact of the matter is, Wisconsin got lucky that Frank Kaminsky and Nigel Hayes developed like the coaching staff thought and that Sam Dekker had an affinity for the state of Wisconsin. Those three formed the backbone of a team capable of competing at the highest levels.

But, where has that player been under Gard’s leadership? Yes, Ethan Happ was fun to watch, but he was a Bo Ryan recruit first and foremost.

Maybe Kobe King is that guy, but his redshirt freshman year wasn’t a tell-tale sign of a player capable of taking over a program and leading it back to the promised land immediately.

There were glimpses of that being possible, but nothing sustained this past season.

In fact, no such signing has emerged as a must-see player for the Badgers to date. D’Mitrik Trice has been good in spurts, Brad Davison struggled to find his rhythm as the season went on this past year and about the only one that has emerged as a real star is big man Nate Reuvers.

He came to Wisconsin as the No. 66 ranked player in the country, and after putting on some weight and getting all the knowledge in a true freshman season, Reuvers became a go-to player on both ends of the court.

But, showing that one recruit can be the backbone of the program isn’t going to cut it. Not when you realize the losses that happened along the way.

Wisconsin lost out to Kentucky for Tyler Herro, Maryland for Diamond Stone and never had a chance with in-state big man Joey Hauser. All of those loses felt like a black eye for the program.

But, the biggest misses have come from the Badgers not being able to close the deal with some of the other big names they identified and went after early on.

Those names include point guard DJ Carton (Ohio State) and Zeke Nnaji (Arizona) in the 2019 class, as well as Payton Pritchard (Oregon) and Zavier Simpson (Michigan) in the 2017 class.

Land one or two of those players and there isn’t much room for the critics to talk. But, the reality is that Gard has yet to close on all but one of the big names offered to date.

This is a huge offseason with the Hauser brothers back on the market and Wisconsin named a finalist by 5-star Jalen Johnson. Getting one of the two situations to go in UW’s favor could be the game-changer needed to elevate this program back towards the top.

On the flip side, how did Bennett build his national championship winning squad? He was able to win on the recruiting trail with bigger names than the Badgers have ever had under Gard and it appears to have finally paid off.

But, there were some serious misses early on in that timeframe. In Bennett’s first class ever, he took the commitments of two top 100 players in KT Harrell and James Johnson.

Two years later and both players were gone, with Harrell off to Auburn and Johnson going to San Diego State and then Liberty as a graduate transfer.

The next year Bennett hit big time on the No. 98 ranked player in the country in guard Malcom Brogdon, but missed on No. 112 ranked Paul Jesperson, who ended up up transferring to Northern Iowa.

In total, Bennett had seven players commit to the program that were in the Top 100 in his first 5 seasons. Of those seven players, four ended up transferring away from the program with none of them making a massive change in the programs they landed at outside of Jesperson.

Only two could be considered successes, as Justin Anderson is in the NBA and was a first round draft pick of the Atlanta Hawks and Mike Tobey spent a few seasons in the NBA before moving overseas.

Over the course of his first five seasons, Bennett may have looked like a winner on paper, but he struggled to keep players in the program.

It was only after those initial struggles that Bennett found his form on the recruiting trail and got wins like Mamadi Diakite, Kyle Guy, Ty Jerome and De’Andre Hunter — three of those coming in just one recruiting class.

Final Verdict

There is no doubt that Tony Bennett has built a near perennial contender in the ACC. What he’s managed to do there is special and as a native Wisconsinite, it’s equally hard to not play the what-if game.

But, the reality is the two coaches have proven to be on similar paths through the first five years as the head coach at these respective schools.

Only time will ultimately tell if Gard is up to the task of making the Badgers back in to true Big Ten and national championship contenders. But, gone are the days where just making the NCAA tournament and finishing fourth every year in the Big Ten would be good enough.

There is and should be pressure on Gard and this program to produce at a higher and more consistent level. Let’s give this coaching staff the chance to do it.

Winning either or both of the recruitments for the transfer of the Hauser brothers or top 5 national 2020 recruit Jalen Johnson would go a long way in solidifying the change in the program.

But, we’ll have a while to wait for those answers it seems.

Until then, there are good lessons to be learned by how Bennett built his program following those first 5 seasons in Charlottesville.

Continue Reading

Badgers Basketball

REPORT: Badgers amongst 4 schools getting visits from Hauser Bros.

Published

on

Simply put, no offseason storyline will get more attention for the Wisconsin Badgers than the second pursuit of the Hauser brothers.

After announcing they were leaving the Marquette program a few weeks ago, plenty of speculation pointed to them landing in Madison. Now we have confirmation they are certainly in the running.

According to a report by CBS Sports Jon Rothstein, Wisconsin is amongst four schools that will get a visit from the brothers prior to them making a decision. UW is joined by Iowa, Michigan State and Virginia according to the report.

There’s no doubt that ties are strong between the Badgers and the Hauser family.

Now head coach and then assistant coach, Greg Gard, was hard after Sam in the 2016 recruiting class. However, with a small scholarship pool to work with, Bo Ryan decided to go with a point guard and ended up taking D’Mitrik Trice once it was all said and done.

It arguably was the biggest reason in not getting Joey to sign in the 2018 class as well.

But, just which of the four has the best chance to land the duo? This is where the Badgers could have the biggest advantage.

As of right now, UW has two scholarships open to take the brothers for the 2019-20 season.

Iowa has a personal connection in Fran McCafferey, who closely recruited both players while they were in high school and have a few players whom the Hauser’s would be comfortable with.

Additionally, the style of play in Iowa City is very similar to that of Marquette and if playing style is the key factor, the Hawkeyes could be attractive.

On the other hand, fellow Big Ten team, Michigan State, seems to be a pie-in-the-sky scenario. The Spartans only lost one of the two players they would have needed in order to land Joey and Sam. Instead, only Nick Ward is gone to the NBA after hiring an agent.

Add in three scholarship players coming in to the program and the Spartans have just one open spot available. Sure, maybe one of them pays their own way for a year before joining on scholarship in 2020-21, but that would be a significant hurdle to overcome.

Virginia could be the front-runner, in large part thanks to the decisions of its three biggest names from this year’s national championship team. De’Andre Hunter, Kyle Guy and Ty Jerome have all declared and hired an agent.

A few weeks ago, that wasn’t so certain. With those three scholarships opening up, only one official signee in the 2019 class and another player entering his name in the transfer portal this could be the Badgers biggest competition.

The question comes down to what the Hauser brothers are going to value most in their next destination. Will personal connections matter more or will getting to play for a program that just won a national championship matter more? What about distant from home?

All of this will be settled shortly, but don’t be surprised to see this be a Badgers vs. Cavaliers battle for the brothers services.

Continue Reading

Badgers Basketball

Big Ten hands out opponent assignments for Badgers basketball in 2019-20

Published

on

The 2018-19 season has been over for just a few weeks now, but the Big Ten is already looking forward to the 2019-20 season.

On Wednesday afternoon it announced the conference opponents for the 20-game slate for each team.

With the switch to the 20-game conference slate last season it means every team will play three team only at home, another three only on the road and the other seven teams in a home-and-home scenario.

Fans will see Illinois, Maryland and Northwestern travel to the Kohl Center for the lone game between them. Wisconsin will travel to Iowa, Michigan and Penn State only.

That leaves home-and-home games against Indiana, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio State, Purdue and Rutgers.

Wisconsin’s faithful followers will see five of the Big Ten’s representatives in this past year’s NCAA tournament come to the Kohl Center at some point next season.

Only Michigan shows up as a lone road game against a Big Ten team to make the tournament this past year as well.

UW will also host Fred Hoiberg, the new coach at Nebraska, for the first time and that should certainly be interesting.

The Big Ten has not released a full schedule of the order of games, but it looks like the Badgers are going to have to fight hard given the teams they will face in home-and-home scenarios.

Continue Reading

Trending

© 2019 Facere Media. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed or sponsored by the University of Wisconsin, it's athletic department or any other university entity. It is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only and is no way associated with the NCAA, the Big Ten or any member institutions.